Bogumil Pacak-Gamalski

As Kevin Farell, the Cardinal Camerlengo of the Vatican, announced on Monday the death of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the 266 Pope of Vatican and Catholic world – His Holiness Francis – I had to look back at His record as a Pontiff.

Who was that man, what he meant to his followers, his flock; what he meant to the world as a whole?

Perhaps the best answer lies in his own memories of that day in Sistine Chapel in 2013, when his fellow cardinals from around the world choose him as a new Vicar of Christ – the pope.

He recalled his conversation on that day, at that moment with his friend, Cardinal Claudio Hummes. Hummes kissed him and congratulated and then said quietly word: the poor. Don’t forget the poor. Cardinal Bergoglio, the new pope, was struck by it and right away thought of St. Francis of Assisi, the patron of the poor, friend of the natural flora and fauna. That’s it – it was clear for him without hesitation – the new pope from far away Argentine will be Francis. And so he was on many occasions, through long, fourteen years of papacy: a friend of the underprivileged, the hungry, and the immigrants hoping for better life, refugees, and victims of wars all over the entire globe. He truly was not a politician, diplomat – he was a shepherd looking after the flock of humanity. Very often beyond that – in his support of ecosystem, for environment, also for his ecumenical work.

He wasn’t John, Paul, Benedict, Pius, Leo – names of great apostles and famous saints of the Church. Just Francis, after a poor young man from Toscany.

After the great scandals of sexual transgressions (in many cases rapes of young boys and girls) during the later days of John Paul II, and during the reign of Benedict, it followed Francis as a dark cloud. Another difficult times was his struggles and fights with the powerful group of conservative cardinals, who rejected the 2 Vatican Synod. Yet, Francis persevered. He understood that the Church to survive it must move from XIX century way of thinking into the XXI century. That if the world changes, so must the Church, without missing or altering the basic tenets of faith. There was always a theological and scholastic doctrine that there is the Church as an embodiment of Christ and there is the Church as an institution, administration, and that second role must move forward with the faithful in the world.

Yet, he wasn’t a ‘revolutionary’ pope by any means. He was just practical and educated. After all, he was a Jesuit, and for a very long time it was widely believed that a Jesuit should never become a pope. ‘Civilian’ clergy (not belonging to any order and the most common) didn’t trust them and were afraid of them. Other, mostly older orders, disliked them too, believing that they were to educated in scientific pursuits instead of proper monastic hymns and payers to God and saints.

Very important in Canada, especially among the First Nations, was the pope visit here and offering an unconditional apology for the role of Catholic Church in the tragedy of running the Residential Schools.

He was also unapologetically critical of Israel’s genocide of Palestinian civilians in their total war with Hamas.

In conclusion it could be said that Francis I came to Rome and changed it in profound way, much more substantial than not wearing the triple crown on the official enthronization or not using all the ‘imperial’ insignia of the Office.  

The new pope will not be able to return to the old ways and will have a hard time to fill his shoes.

On my part the only serious disappointment was his inability to full accept the women role in Church. As the Church couldn’t and will not survive without women, both from religious Orders and laity.