Tag: poetry

Lęk

Lęk

Bogumił Pacak-Gamalski

LĘK

A czasem, czasem naprawdę nie wiem,

czy nie żal tej czystej bieli kartki,

nie zabrudzonej żadnym słowem.

Kartki milcząco cicho płaczącej.

Czy nie żal tuszu w długopisie i

tej pieśni nie śpiewanej i głuchej?

Smutek dusi, chwyta zaciśnietą pięścią za serce i czujesz jego palce, kostki chwytające aortę. Potem maszeruje, jak pająk do góry i wyciska z oczu suche łzy. Suchy płacz pozbawiony krzty wilgoci, mokrości, wilgotności. A płacz mimo to.

Nie ma komu cokolwiek opowiadać, nie ma z kim prowadzić rozmowy. Trzeba by było wszystko tłumaczyć, wyjaśniać od początku, a to nie to samo – to wykład by był, przemówienie wybrakowane nieobecnością ciepła i serdeczności współbycia, współrozumienia.

A ciągle mam tyle rzeczy, wierszy

do powiedzenia i ciągle chcę

usłyszeć tyle nowych zaklęć, słów.

To tak, gdy mówisz tylko półzdanie,

a ktoś myśl podejmuje, rozwija.

Wspólny spacer wspólnymi drogami.

Znają cię, ty znasz ich. Współistniejstwo. Przerwane, zamknięte, utracone. Może siedzi gdzieś nad jakąś rzeczką powolnie płynącą zakolami kujawskimi, piaskowymi, biednymi łąkami mazowieckimi? Może wartkim strumieniem, kaskadą huczącą w Kordylierach kanadyjskich? Możę było, a już nie ma? Wszystko zamienia się w cmentarz, gdy umierają ludzie. Więdną kwiatki łączane, milkną ptaszki, które wczoraj wiły pośród nich gniazda.

A przecież gdzieś życie musi istnieć jeszcze, z każdego szarego badyla listek jeszcze musi się wykulić, zazielenić. Samotność prowadzi długie rozmowy z cieniami. Trzeba je tylko rozpędzić w cztery strony świata, a samotność przestanie być sama. Będzie biegać po tych łąkach, po tych uliczkach, łapać motyle i potem wypuszczać je z garści.

Trzeba się tylko obudzić, wstać z łóżka tej samotności. Niech samotnością być przestanie. Wtedy i wiersze głuche usłyszą melodię, zatańczą leśmianowską łąką.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Thomas Mann in another part of the forest

Bogumil Pacak-Gamalski

Thomas Mann and Klaus Mann – father and son – have brought me back to reading novels. I have mentioned long time ago, that I have given up that old habit quite a few years ago. 

After you consume rather large amount of certain dishes – you got tired of it. You recognize the same sauces, the same spices and little culinary tricks repeated by all writers.

Granted, I am not very verse in all the current new titles – but it takes more than one generation and at least and epoch to change it substantially. I do still browse through the new titles a bit at the beginning, a bit in the middle, and the epilog. It is very predictable, even if put nicely together. 

But Klaus Mann, whom I have not read that much in years gone long ago, sparked my interest again in novel. I have written about it on these pages very recently, therefore I will not expand on it again.

Suffice to say, due to my own tragedy of immense Loss, his treatment and writing on the subject of love brought back to me the beauty of love, the sorrow of its end – and absolutely undisputable power of that amazing feeling. No loss is ever going to be greater than the experience of love, and no price is too big to pay for it later.

His stories in three short novels, of Alexander the Great and of two friends and the absolute and delicate way he wrote and composed it were exquisite.  His tenderness of portraying these feelings gave me strength to write about them from my own perspective, my own experience. Somehow Klaus Mann became my friend, my confidante. My writing about Love and Loss was like meeting him in a café in Berlin or in Paris, perhaps even in New York and just talking about it. About his searches and mine. Books (good books) do that sometimes to you. Hence my posts were not per se reviews of young Mann’s books, but a case of mutual conversation, in a manner of speech, naturally. Below are links to this texts of mine:

Sprawa zakochania się w tekście literackim – > > Pogwarki < <

Vancouver sunsetting, Vancouver’s English Bay – > > Pogwarki < <

Na szczytach Olimpu z moim Hefajstionem – > > Pogwarki < <

Our talks in Babylon – > > Pogwarki < <

That prompted me to look for his big volume of memoires “The turning point. Thirty-five years in this century”[i].  I went to our Main Library in Vancouver to get that book. They didn’t have it on the shelf but brought it to me from some sort of warehouse room were some books spent for some reasons a solitary life. Not for eternity, mind you, LOL. Maybe it needed some fixing, repairs?  It was not in the best shape. After all – that book was published … 84 years ago! Since I liked Thomas already and knew that he wrote about French writer Andre Gide, who happens to be my very much liked writer – I asked for that book, too. This time it was supposed to be on shelf not in some purgatory warehouse. I got the coded number, went to right spot – and the book wasn’t there. Returned to that young library assistant, who got me the big book of Mann memoires and ask him if he could find me that book. He said with a smile: of course, just follow me. I did. But he was going to big section called “English Literature”. So, I stopped him and asked why is going there, instead to were Mann’s book should be. His answer just astonished me and made me giggle a bit. The answer was: well, this book is in English in our catalogue.

God have mercy!  – I almost shouted.  Instead, I just explained to him –  My dear young man, you have that book in English language, but it is a German writer. Therefore it is, as it should be, in “World Literature “section. The same as Victor Hugo, Pablo Neruda, Dostoyevsky and hundreds of other writers, who were of other nationalities and wrote in other languages. 

Let me remind you again dear reader – that young and pleasant fellow was an assistant in the Main Library in a very big metropolitan city. O, tempora, o mores …

Back at the right section he did re-checked the shelves from top to bottom and the book really wasn’t there.  Too bad, but of course it was not his fault. We were just about to leave when he noticed a book at the bottom and happily announced: there it is! That book about your Gide!  I have noticed that book earlier. No, it was not written by Klaus Mann. That was the reason I went to him to help me searching for the right one. That one he pointed to was by another well known writer and  I have read his book many, many years ago, when I was working on series of articles about the history of gay-themed literature written often by gay writers or scholars.

By then I was truly tired mentally and physically and my leg was hurting. His jumping the gun and prematurely announcing that fateful: I know proved that he didn’t know and didn’t listen, arrogantly thinking that he did.

 Was he an arrogant? Maybe that would be too harsh a judgment. But I wish he listened more acutely and paid more attention to question being raised. After all, he was a library assistant. And I did ask him about a book by Klaus Mann. Not another (albeit very famous in his own right) author.

When I went home I reached to my bookshelves and retrieved from there my copy of Andre Gide “L ‘Immoraliste”[ii] and read it again. What a pleasure. 

At the end I was not angry. Actually, it was sort of amusing. I think that it was a good chance (remember – Main Library in major city) of him being a graduate of some university’s (or college, the very least) Humanities Faculty. My librarian in my Junior School was not the nicest lady. But she knew her stuff.  It meant she knew books. O tempora, o mores, my dear Cicero, LOL.

                Wouldn’t be myself if I have missed the possibility of being … arrogant about well know book. Yes, the very voluminous volume of Klaus Mann (with the help of his dear sister, Erika) autobiography “The turning point. Thirty-five years in this century”.  I have borrowed it and had to read it. Well, almost. I did huge portion of it, admittedly. Many scholars admire the book. I thought it was an awful way of writing autobiography. There are few ways to do it interestingly – he just mixed them all together, filled with thousands of totally unimportant details of country, cities he lived in (especially as a very young lad, well before becoming a writer), complicated  and not that influential on himself familial connections: just way too much to consume, page after page. I wish it was half as thick. All in a total contrast to a very concise way of writing his novels. There were certainly paragraphs, sections very important to know about him and his world, but at the end it was a dinner that had way too many side dishes. At times, you felt like a guest at a dinner, who just thinks o himself: is it ever going to end? If I still want to read his book about Andre Gide, it is for one reason only: Gide. Thomas was the last good writer (he was a good writer, as I said), who went to Paris and to spent time there and to get to know the great Gide. Gide was already very mature and older writer, decades older then young Mann.  Thomas told him, he will write a book about great Andre Gide. Gide, who knew Paul Verlaine and Arthur Rimbaud! All of it, young bisexual Klaus Mann, his adored French poet bisexual Andre Gide and his connection to scandalizing stars of homosexual Paris in XIX century of the decadent period.  A story from my forest, and a forest I spent many years of writing about and reading about all of them (except Klaus Mann, whom I just met his year, LOL).  Just like that absolutely glorious book published many years ago here in Canada: “Meanville , in another part of the forest”[iii].             

[i] “The turning point/thirty-five years in this century”, Klaus Mann, pub. by M.L.B. Fisher, New York, 1944

[ii] A. Gide, “Immoralista”, trans. by Izabella Rogozinska; wyd. Zielona Sowa; Krakow, PL, 2006

[iii] “Meanwhile in another part of the forest. Gay stories from Alice Munro to Yukio Mishima” edited by A. Manguel and C. Stephenson; pub. by Alfred A. Knoph Canada; 1994, Toront

Na szczytach Olimpu z moim Hefajstionem

Na szczytach Olimpu z moim Hefajstionem

Bogumił Pacak-Gamalski-Graham

Moje nieustające fscynacje z historią Aleksandra Macedońskiego w wersji przekazanej nam przez Klausa Manna. Eh, Klaus, Klaus, coś ty mi narobił, narozrabial w tej głowie? Przecież znałem tą historię tak dobrze  od dziesięcioleci chyba już. A ty mi tu takie tam inne odcienie, półcienie, zamglenie we mgle sentymentu podsuwasz pod oczy, a z oczu naturalnie wciska mi się to w duszę.  /… /

(pisane w Craft Cafe na bulwarze nad rzeką Fraser w New Westminster)

szkic Hefajstiona w muzeum w Madrycie (ze zbiorów Wikepdii)

Klaus, jak wiedzieć mogłeś, że Aleksander przez dni kilka okrywał całunem pocałunków miłości całe ciało Hefajstiona? Że nie pozwolił dworzanom i żołnierzom oderwać cię od tego ciała, które było strumieniem jego życia właśnie, tego samego niepokonanego nigdy Aleksandra? Aleksandra, który zwyciężył armie całego świata. Aż śmierć tego umiłowanego generała, przyjaciela, kochanka jego nie pokonała. Życiodajnym strumieniem płynącym z macierzyńskiej Pel[i]i? Które było kwiatami Babilonu? Które było złotem Gangesu i Brahmaputry? Które było kolumnami Persepolis[ii]?

Jak wiedzieć mogłeś, że wszystkie stolice świata, tobołki pełne pereł, diamentów, złota i szmaragdów nie mogły kupić biletu powrotnego dla Hefajstiona?

to nie to, czy ten co odszedł dał ci życie

to to, że on był życiem

pytanie jest czy oddałbyś swoje

bo kochałeś

i łzy milczące napłynęły,

bo znikąd rady ni pomocy

dostać nie mogłeś

i byłeś bezbronny i słaby,

jako najniższy z niewolników,

a łzy same popłynęły z oczu

/B. Pacak-Gamalski/

                I otworzyła się brama w ścianie mojego Czasu: bogowie, lub herosi za ich pozwoleniem, przenieśli mnie w te dni okrutne, dni żegnania mego Hefajstiona. Dni, kiedy kładłem się obok niego, podłączonego do sieci różnorodnych elektronicznych czujników wyświetlających na ekranach wykresy symboli przypominających starą grekę z dni Arystotelesa i jego ucznia, Aleksandra; przez usta wpuszczono długiego węża[iii] , który wśliznął się do jego płuc i w równomiernych odstępach wdychał w nie powietrze. Dwa dni i dwie noce byłam do tego łóżka przytroczony siłą niepojetą.  Opowiadałem mu wszystkie dni naszego życia, wszystkie dekady naszych domów i mieszkań, podróży kontynentalnych i lokalnych; wąwozy, góry, wybrzeża oceanów, nasze plaże i nasze balkony.

Próbowano, namawiano, tłumaczono, że muszę odpocząć, pojechać do domu przespać parę godzin. Na końcu do małego pokoiku  przy tej wielkiej sali ICU[iv] wniesiono  jakąś kozetkę i namówiono mnie bym dał sobie czas na krótki sen, obiecując zawiadomić mnie natychmiast o jakiejkolwiek zmianie sytuacji. Uległem namowie i położyłem się. Natychmiast zasnąłem. Gdy się obudziłem zerwałem się z przerażeniem, że spałem.  Pobiegłem błyskawicznie do pokoju mego Hefajstiona z wyrzutem wobec medyków, że pozwolili mi  tak długo spać. Uśmiechnęli się lekko i smutno, jeden z nich odpowiedział: spałeś niecałe piętnaście minut.

Potem zebrało sie konsylium. Poprosili bym siadł przy ich stole: kardiolog, neurolog, pulmonolog i doktor od psychologii. Pani psycholożka była dla mnie, choć nie sądziłem, że jestem chory. Reagowałem dość – zdaniem moim – normalnie  na sytuację w jakiej się znalazłem.

Mówiono ciepło i monotonnie, cicho ale stanowczo: twoje płaty mózgowe na moment nie drgnęły, zostało tylko ciało – bezbronne, że powinienem dać zgodę, by ciebie od tych próbek, od tych węży odłączyć, by twoje ciało mogło też usnąć, bo jest zbyt zmęczone. Pani psycholożka wyjaśniła, że twój duch był świadom życia ostatni raz w moich ramionach, gdy czekałem na karetkę wtulając cię w moje pocałunki, moje wdmuchiwanie w ciebie powietrze. I że wtedy, bez paroksyzmów niemocy odleciałeś w przestrzeń poza naszą.

Nie, nie zerwałem się tak, jak Aleksander i nie wymordowałem tych bezsilnych medyków od ciała i duszy. Rozumiałem, że nie mogę twojego pięknego ciała męczyć ponad miarę, że muszę się nad samolubność i egoizm własny wznieść. Dałem tą zgodę z jednym zastrzeżeniem: po odłączeniu od tych sączek, macek i próbek ja muszę tam wejść i sam z nim tylko pozostać. Co zrobiono i zasłoniono szczelnie kotary, by wzrok kogokolwiek nie ośmielił się mnie i ciebie, Hefajstionie widzieć.

Leżałeś piękny, spokojny, bez drżenia, bez wstrząsów, bez drgań. Łagodny – czekałeś. Położyłem się obok, wtuliłem w ciebie. Całowałem od stóp poczynając, w górę aż do ust, nosa, oczu. Byłeś znowu sobą – kolumną i filarem mojego spokoju. Nawet nie wzbraniałeś od pieszczot ostatnich. Jak dekady wcześniej, gdy oddałeś się kompletnie nad jakimś strumieniem u podnóża wielkich gór – grzbietu Ameryk. Nasza droga od naszej Macedonii do naszego Babilonu. Nasze piękne życie. Nie mogę swoim zwyczajem być zbyt dumny Hefajstionie, muszę za nie podziękować wszystkim bogom wszystkich czasów: archaicznego, antycznego i nowożytnego. Nawet jeśli tych bogów nie było.

Może bogami są wszystkie dusze, które po odłączenu się od ciał, zamieszkują na najwyższych szczytach Atlasu, Himalajów, Kaukazu, Kordylierów, Olimpu i Karkonoszy?

[i] Stolica Mcedonii w czasach Aleksandra Wielkiego

[ii] Stolica starożytnej Persji

[iii] Wąż był symbolem helleńskiego boga sztuki lekarskiej, Asklepiosa

[iv] Intensive Care Unit (oddział intensywnej terapii)

Our talks in Babylon

Bogumil Pacak-Gamalski

It is the most beautiful time of the year in Vancouver, particularly in the West End and around the Lost Lagoon, the charming gateway to Stanley Park. On a sunny day is all a song, a poem. The time of flowering umbrellas of rosy cherry trees, of majestic magnolias, and the tiny flowers of children sprouting from the soil in multitude of colours. The singing birds returned to their nests, their homes on the branches of massive trees. Their colossal migration almost done, they are back at home. A reflection comes to mind: just as my migration finishes. Back home, all the way from the shores of mighty Atlantic, across the vast continent.

With a book in hand I read familiar story of another traveler: Alexander, the young king of Macedonia. I have read many accounts of the ancient story written by historian and writers. The story of conquests and of battles and a story of searching for love.

Yes, there were numerous battles small and great; there were many corpses of his soldiers and generals – but all of it does not matter. In the annals of history of man there are always battlefields and dead bodies strewn on the banks of some great rivers, on the shores of some seas.

But the quest for love is different than the quest for land, or hegemony. The quest for love is worthy of all and every battle and the only thing when murder and death are excusable. For what is greater than She after all? She gives meaning to live and She excuses death.

Alexander and Hephaestion

hunting a stag

                As I read the story again[i] – the battles and the fallen soldiers and generals do not matter to me. It is the travel through lands unknown bringing chances of love and romances that matters to me. How had it changed him? Each culture enriched him, each lovemaking, with a woman or man made him different, too. He was no longer Alexander of Macedonia, no longer even Macedonian nor Greek. He was the Great Alexander. Man, who could have had anyone and anything. Did he? Did he quenched his thirst, filled his hunger?

At the very end: was it one, big irony that his conquer had defeated him? Whom should I ask? Gilgamesh[ii] or the great poet Rumi[iii] of XCCC century Persia?

Indeed funny, that it brings me to these names. Not to Shakespeare, or even Dante Alighieri – they are just famous copiers of stories of ancient Love Immortal, or very much deadly indeed – Love Mortal.

The story, a tale perhaps, as told by no one other than Klaus Mann (himself a hunter of love) brings me my own memory. As he (Mann) of Alexander’s stay in Babylon – the cradle of civilization – he recounts the young king visit and tribute to Ishtar[iv], who was so instrumental for the fate of Gilgamesh.  Moreover, he mentions Alexander visit to the temple of Marduk [p. 89]. The temple was from the times of king Nebuchadnezzar[v] .

I have never been a sculptor. Yet, in the equally ancient time of my childhood, being maybe a boy of twelve, maybe thirteen, I did with my own hands sculpted from the red clay of Masovia a small figurine of Marduk sitting on a large throne, with his beard coiffure intricately in layers – the way the Bavylonians did in the time of Nebuchadnezzar. Ha! A friend of my father (who was, unlike me, a formally trained sculptor) grabbed that sculpture of mine, called it ‘marvelous’ and took it to some local small museum somewhere in or around Olsztyn in Masurian forest. Never seen it since, nor heard of it again, LOL. Perhaps it still is on some dusty shelf there (where exactly?), LOL. Sufficient to say I have never sculpted again. There is certainly enough of Rodins in Louvres of the world.

                The old gods of Syria and Mesopotamia did not touched me and Marduk wasn’t exactly a god of love, more a god of war and revenge. Nonetheless, a god. But let’s go to our Alexander. Our lovely, terrifying, amorous, beautiful and merciless Boy-King in his quest for love. Love – the only thing that is immortal in the lives of silly kings and heroes through our entire history.

Mann states: ‘He wanted to be loved, and nothing was more important to him.’ [p. 89] .

I am not a sculptor, I am just a poet. Let me try to say it clearly in versed form:

In the Gardens of Semiramis love grew

in rows on cascading steps  of all colours;

of aromas conquering their souls and hearts.

Was it forever mine to claim, cherish, to behold?

When my king will lead me to battle

and I will be slain by a sword or an arrow –

I will be happy to say: I have been loved

and I was in love. My destiny was fulfilled.

(by B. Pacak-Gamalski, March 2026)

Alexander galloping through Asia on his beloved Bucephallus comes to Egypt. There he wants his lover to be made a god. Immortal. Hephaestion is denied the transformation (as given previously for Alexander himself) and is forced to be contained with a lesser denomination as a hero. But it is of no use for him, he already was given the ultimate prize, the highest possibly – a love eternal from his Beloved himself – Alexander. When he dies Alexander weeps for days as he lays on the body of his friend and lover, when he dies. Soon after that tragic death, Alexander dies himself. Did he loved as much the young eunuch boy, so beautiful Bagoas? He did likely in the moment they were kissing, but his soul was already given totally to Hephaestion.

Gods are not very forgiving to people for their all-consuming great loves. It threatens the love and adoration they expect from men toward the gods, not other mortals. But gods are blind, too. They think too much of themselves, perhaps they love themselves too much? For everything is mortal: people, heroes and gods. The only thing immortal is Love itself.

I should know a bit about it, for I have met Love once in my short journey. Au Wiedersefen, Herr Mann, goodbye my dear god-like Alexander.   

[i] Klaus Mann “Alexander”, pub. Hesperus Press Ltd; London, 2007

[ii] Gilgamesh | Epic, Summary, & Facts | Britannica

[iii] Rumi – World History Encyclopedia

[iv] Ishtar | Goddess, Worship, & Facts | Britannica

[v] Nebuchadnezzar II | Biography, Accomplishments, & Facts | Britannica

Rozmowy z tobą

Rozmowy z tobą

Bogumił Pacak-Gamalski

Rzeki życia

Rzeka wielka, muskularna, stalowo-szara

rzeka, której bulwarami przechadzam się

teraz w nasiąkłym od wody powietrzu –

jest mi dziwnie bliska i wyraźnie obca.

Woła mnie zachrypniętym głosem

starej aktorki, która niegdyś grała

Marię Stuart i Desdemonę – a dziś

tylko wiedźmę kuszącą Makbeta.

Macham na nią znudzoną ręką

obojętności. Jakie królestwa

możesz mi obiecać, jakie korony

niepotrzebne? Vene, vide. Vici?

Tak, widziałem, zwyciężyłem i byłem

zwyciężonym.  Jakaż słodka to była

niewola! I jak gorzka zwrócona

później wolność niedosycenia.

Jeszcze zbyt wcześnie ofiarowana,

a już za późno na oczekiwania.

W górze rzeka atmosferyczna

siąpi i nasącza włosy i duszę.

B. Pacak-Gamalski, 18.03. 2026, New Westminster

Czasem wiersz jest najlepszym sposobem ‘rozmowy z lustrem’, wiwisekcji splątanych węzłów życia. Tłumaczyłem na tych łamach kilkakroć w przeszłości, że wiersz nigdy nie powinien być pisany dla wszystkich (zwłaszcza nie dla wydawców, krytyków, dla ludzi-czytelników). ‘Ludzie-czytelnicy’ to liczba mnoga, a wiersz to liczba indywidualna. Wiersz należy zawsze i bezwzględnie pisać tylko do jednego czytelnika, słuchacza, adresata. To musi być intymna rozmowa dwóch podmiotów: wiersza i czytelnika. Jeśli masz coś intymnego do powiedzenia przyjacielowi nie możesz tego robić na wiecu. Nawet spotkanie autorskie nie zwalnia nas z tego obowiązku. Każdy słuchacz musi wiedzieć, czuć, że ten wiersz teraz czytany jest właśnie dla niego. Bo w wierszu odsłaniamy swą całkowitą bezbronność, swoje najkruchsze ego. Swoją słabość, która jest jedyną siłą, jaką posiadamy.

Naturalnie jest poezja pompatyczna, do ludzkości, do narodu. Bzdura. I ta najbardziej pompatyczna jest zawsze tylko dla jednego czytelnika – tego, który ją teraz czyta lub słyszy. Inaczej jest blagą, oszustwem oczekującym na akceptację tłumu. Każde spotkanie ze sztuką jest przeżyciem prywatnym, intymnym.

Inne epoki, czasy odległe inną miały miarę i oczekiwania. XIX i XX wiek kompletnie to wywróciły i odrzuciły. Dały wolność jednostce, temu ja i ty, które jest początkiem i końcem kontaktów międzyludzkich.

Od czasów niespodziewanej i nagłej śmierci mojego męża wiersze, które piszę są rodzajem kontynuowania moich rozmów z nim. W okrutnym czasie tuż po tej Stracie z naturalnych względów były tym – opisem Straty, jej okrucieństwa i pustki, aktem niezgody, oskarżaniem bogów i siebie, że do tego dopuściliśmy, że Czasu nie zatrzymaliśmy. To było naturalne. Ale Kosmos i bogowie mnie nie opuścili, nie zdradzili. Tragedie indywidualne godne eposów antycznych zdarzają się stale. Czemu? Nie wiem. Fatum? Czy istnieje coś takiego? Też nie wiem.

Do życia – innego zupełnie i nieznanego mi przedtem – jednak wróciłem. Ciągle zachwyca mnie moment, zachwyca – też mimo wszystko – człowiek, jego piękno i jego ból, jego kruchość i potęga. I odtąd te wiersze, to zapis moich rozmów z nim – mom najbliższym przyjacielem. To mój pierwszy indywidualny, pojedynczy czytelnik-słuchacz. Gdy wiersz wychodzi ‘w świat’ (publikacja, spotkanie poetyckie) – tą rozmowę podejmuję z każdym indywidualnym czytelnikiem. To moja cicha rozmowa z tym czytelnikiem/czką. Inaczej bym się nie odważył pisać.

post scriptum: zamieszczona fotgrafia-portret, to zdjęcie mojego męża

Dzieci poezji i parków

Bogumił Pacak-Gamalski

                                                                                                                                             Melriches, March 12.26

Ulica Egzystencji

Uśmiechy ludzi mijanych na chodniku.

Obojętne spojrzenia innych na tymże.

Życie, ludzie mają swoje dzienne sprawy.

Mogą być też zwyczajnie zmęczeni tym dniem.

Późne popołudnie to wszak czas powrotów

z pracy, nie lubianej przez większość – współczesnej

formy pańszczyzny ich przodków. Wymianie

uległy jedynie nazwy, nie zasady.

Wczoraj śnieg wrócił. Mokry. Brudna breja

biało-szara zaległa uliczki między

starymi kamieniczkami i nowymi

wieżowcami, gdzie skryli się mieszczanie

ze wzrokiem utkwionym w szklanych ekranach

telewizorów, zawsze obecnych ręcznych

telefonach, tabletach, komputerach.

Te kamienice i wieżowce nie mają

znaczenia dla bezdomnych. Szukają tylko

jakiegoś nawisu nad parterami tych

kamienic, szklano-stalowych wieżowców.

Miejsca, gdzie mogą usiąść na swoich workach,

które wypełnia ich dobytek, ich wózkach.

Nie zwracają uwagi na mieszczan, którzy

mijają ich obojętnie, przyzwyczajonych

do ich egzystencji: tak widać być musi.

Biedacy i mieszczanie. Dwie Egzystencje.

Idę więc tą ulicą Egzystencji,

i jednak się uśmiecham. Mimo kropelek

deszczu, znajduję w moim mieście kwitnące

magnolie, zawilce i żonkile żółte.

Opodal alejki Kreciego Wzgórza

skromny krzaczek różany z jednym kwiatem,

płonącym żółtym płomykiem-latarenką.

Odwiedziłem wcześniej mój Kościół – Bibliotekę.

Zwrócić jedną książkę i pożyczyć drugą.

Taka wymiana opłatka komunijnego.

Komunia Święta to my. Jesteśmy Komunią,

jesteśmy komunardami paryskimi.

I uśmiecham się znowu popijając

kawę w ulubionej kawiarni na Davie.

Dobrze jest być komunardem. Nie, nie chce być

ani Robespierrem, ani Maratem. Nie.

Wolę być zwykłym komunardem biegnącym

od kawiarenki do kawiarenki paryskiej

z bagietką w jednej ręce, drugą z butelką

taniego wina, krzyczącym: Liberté!

Fraternité! Eh, Egalité zgubiłem!

Nigdy nie będziemy równi, czymś się jednak

odróżniać musimy, aby nie było nudno.

Mój smutek i żal? Moja tęsknota gdzie?

Zawsze są ze mną, dzieci się nie porzuca.

Bogumił Pacak-Gamalski, Vancouver, 2026

While wandering through the streets of our city …

While wandering through the streets of our city …

Bogumil Pacak-Gamalski-Graham

Question

So, tell me how it is,

tell me now who am I?

Where I am and why?

Time is timeless, so they say,

with no beginnings, no end,

why was it short for us?

It begun one day, to end

with no excuse offered?

The flower was sentenced

to flourish with vibrant colours

only for one day, one night.

Why the gift begun a sentence

so cruel, that I was left wandering,

weeping, dying slowly, to be resurrected

at night over and over again?   

Years have passed and the broken

Sisyphus still pushes the boulder

of broken promise to the top of

the Mountain of Death, which

many called Life by mistake.

You, the false cartographer of maps!

Who gave you the power, the utter

arrogance, to name the Columns of Men

by erroneous name and promise?

What is the geography of humans

without the light, the love, the need

to be with other, who makes them whole?

So cruel is your ungodly design

to mark two separate frail human

bodies and fuse them into one soul –

than separating them by sending

the Angel of Death to take one only,

while leaving the other to be alive

 in grief overwhelming and soulless.

B. Pacak-Gamalski, Vancouver, 19.02.26

Loganberry

Loganberry

Bogumil Pacak-Gamalski

Every boy and every girl need to have a poet, who reminds them of the power of love. Something they absolutely must be certain of, something that hangs like a heavy, sweet fruit from the low branches that you are forced to reach, pick in your hands and sunk your teeth into it. Absorb the sweet aroma, let juices flow from your lips to your soul.

Let me be the poet, who will take you to the garden and show you the delicate foliage of the ancient orange shrubs and their sweet berries. The loganberries.  

A sweet logan berry

hangs from your lips

like a promise of heaven.

What is heaven, you ask?

Heaven is like a kiss,

silent yet powerful.

Heaven is red like

quivering lips of logan berry.

Heaven is when you are

becoming someone’s berry.

A red, live, pulsating Loganberry.

How would I know, how would I dare to foretell stories like that? Because I am a poet and if poets know anything – they do know love, her ways and her magic. Poets know long walks by the small banks of streams, where the berries are plentiful in late summer evenings, and they see there pairs of young lovers picking the berries and placing them in the mouth of their beloved ones. Poets, being poets, go home and write a poem about it. After all, that is all they know how to do. Hoping to explain the ways of love to some young boy or girl. They are like the loganberry – all they know is how to grow and become sweet and inviting, hoping that some girl or boy will pick them and taste them. The rest is mystery like the morning mist climbing the shores of small stream.

My Three Loves

My Three Loves

Bogumił Pacak-Gamalski-Graham

My Three Loves never left me. I have never left them, nor have I forgotten them. Through all my early years as a teenager, in an old country on the old continent, country that was greyer than the buildings sorrowing people, who lived there.

Mnemosyne

(by Dante Rossetti)

But my first love that had sprouted in my heart made it flowering, singing above the roofs of these grey buildings. The city of grey buildings, that rose from the ashes of the worst war that fell upon humankind. Yet – my first love gave it a warm embrace that belongs to the titanic Mnemosyne, mother of all the muses, daughter of Uranus and Gaia[i]. She was not the most sympathetic and meek of Titans with a slightly twisted taste in romantic escapades, after all she also bedded Zeus himself, who was logically speaking … her brother. But who’s blaming anyone? Not the Greek gods (or any gods, god forbid!) for their erotic (diss)behavior. I am merely a human, nothing more. For me then, in the grey city of my grey youth, Mnemosyne was the mother of Muses. That cleared her of any other crimes or indiscretions. Who would anyway, any other way? Surely, not when you are fifteen, seventeen or twenty! Love disregards all and any boundaries. And I was in love! Purely platonic, but fearless and furious; intellectually and emotionally on equal basis. And that love, otherwise called ‘friendship’, stayed with me my entire long life. I have never left her, she stayed with me in my traveling luggage all these decades.

My two other loves happened years after the first one. The next one happened almost unknowingly to my senses. It happened in that old country, still very much grey and poor, but on a threshold of new-found freedom, with dreams and appetites for brighter and greener fields ahead. A boy was borne of familial spring, just like the nymphs chasing after the image of Hyacinthus immortalized by songs of his Olympian lover – the God of Love Itself.  But beware of love offered by gods, my dear boy! They never end well for lesser lovers. I’ll tell you a story here, later on, in the last chapter, of the price I paid for asking for, and being granted the Love Immortal. The grief is as deadly, as the disk of Apollion that killed his lover – Hyacinthus. But wait, I take back these warnings and the words of sorrow and grief. For Love Eternal outlasts grief and sorrow. Each time and every time. Lament is temporary and is a sign of temporarily losing your perspective. If you grief losing a lover – the lover’s love will come back to you in time, for love can’t be solitary. It will seek and enter the other lover’s soul, because Love needs a nest.  

Alas, we went too far in this true fable, the allegoric story of my ordinary life and my Loves Immortal.

Boy was born in the Old Country, as I said. We all rejoiced. Remember walking with my parents, his older sister (a child herself), and the little boy in a walking stroller, a long walk through the countryside near Warsaw, through fields and meadows, to an old palace of some aristocratic imminence and a beautiful stream running through the meadows. Of course, we all loved the new boy. But I had no idea how important, how encompassing, and not always easy at all, that love would be. Didn’t have to wait very long, though, just few more years, few more of my returns to that old familial country and I knew. It was unspoken, unexplained, but very clear. She sprung not suddenly and unexpectedly, didn’t come from ‘the bolt in the sky’ (as it did happen in my last Love Eternal).

It was warmly growing inside me, flowering with tenderness. He was still a child, whom I could carry on my shoulders, as we walked through the streets of that old city that used to be so grey in my youth. But now the city was truly beautiful, transformed by modernity and embracing Western Europe. With that, it embraced the traditions of old Greece, of Zeus and Plato, and Plato’s talks with the boy Phaidros. The sweet youth, who desired his teacher, the old Socrato, and a thought that there must be something wrong with him, since his beloved teacher would not accept the gift of his pupil’s young body. But Socrates was wiser than simple desire. He knew that the boy deserves better than a tired body of not very attractive nor a rich old teacher. That in itself, without any further arguments, proves that Socrat was perhaps in love with that youth and choose of his own will a chanced possibility of better future for Phaidros. A sacrifice, if you will.

Not unlike relationship between Herr Aschenbach and sweet adolescent Tadzio, in “Death in Venice”[ii]. Sweet, tender and innocent – until one afternoon Aschenbach runs away from Tadzio to a park, exhausted and ashamed of himself collapses on a bench and hears himself saying aloud the dreaded proclamation: I love you. But once you say it aloud there is no escape, no turning time back. Ha! That ‘thing’: your desire, your dream could be the abyss of torment. Bliss and condemnation eternal.

What happened in that novella, if it happened and why, is totally irrelevant to our discourse on Love Immortal.  If you want to – buy or borrow that booklet from a library. It is not very long, but definitely it is master class of literature.

Hence – back to our story, my Second Love eternal to that boy from an old capital in Central Europe. Years (not that many in my calendar, but must have felt like an eternity in a teenager’s life of that boy) have passed and that boy, in a pivotal time of transformation into adulthood, comes to me in the New World, across the vast ocean and entire continent in search of his destiny(?), his ways through life. In short: in search of himself. At that time I was already well established, secured and totally committed and enthralled with my lifetime Love Eternal, one that consumed me happily, engulfed, and enthralled me without any hesitation. The one that was romantic and erotic. That boy from the Old Country came here exactly for these reasons, too. Firstly, he knew that I love him dearly and sincerely and I would not offer him anything that would be false, or based on pretense or judgment; would protect him, in as much as I could, from any harm that a sudden freedom can bring too.

That was the time, when my Love for that boy transformed to my Love Eternal: when he stopped being a boy from an Old Country, a nephew, for whom you care enormously – he became my Prodigal Son. Without any too strict connotation to the biblical story (of course, if needed, mistakes and transgressions would be forgiven – what proper father would not?). With another number of years the boy become a mature, well established, and educated man. For any parent, biological or emotional, it sounds like a solid reason to be proud. I am.

My Third Love

How should I name you, how should I call you, by what name? Who you are, who you were, where are you?

I can call you by my name for you are me. I can call you by your name for I am you. I can call you Love for you are My Love. Encompassing all my days and nights. Quivering like a blade of grass on summery meadow. Quivering and fluttering like my heart, when I call your name. I won’t be scared whispering to you: I love you – I will be brimming with pride, when I say it. You, who crossed the continent with me, to be with me. When I asked you, where we should settle for our sunset years, you answered: anywhere where you are going to be, because you are my Home.

When we met at the foothills of majestic Cordillera, bellow the amazing peak of Assiniboine Mountain, on the meadows flowing from the enormous Mount Temple, when we walked in the shadow of Mount Robson I wanted to hold your hand in mine. Wanted to show you how beautiful you look in the glory of these peaks surrounding you. Wanted to ask the angels floating around these peaks to come down and embrace you in their warm, godly wings. Just as I would, if I was a god. Maybe we were the gods? Didn’t we possess the most important attribute of deity: Love Eternal? Love that is everlasting. The Black Angel of Mercy in Hyde Park on Manhattan told us so, when we went on sunny October day to visit him.

When we walked the beaches of Northern Pacific in Tofino telling the anemones the story of our love – they danced in waves of happiness; when we walked the white beaches of Eastern Shore on Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia – the eagles danced above our heads and parasailors smiled seeing us traversing the beach.

You – my Third Love were the epitome of love, the Mount Everest of being alive. If I ever would lose the sense of smell – I would still remember the smell of your skin. If I ever lose my sight – I would still clearly see your eyes. If I ever lose my memory – I would want to not know who I am at all, because I would be nothing without the memory of Our Love.

[i] parents of Zeus

[ii] a novella by Thomas Mann